Sustrans are working with Bath and North East Somerset Council as part of the Cycling Ambitions Fund 2 (CAF) to consider how walking and cycling in several areas throughout Bath could be improved. We will be engaging directly with local communities in order to understand the needs and aspirations of those living and working within the project areas.
As part of this process, Sustrans and BANES will be holding a number on-street events and running an online interactive map, giving people the opportunity to tell them what is currently stopping them from walking and cycling and which routes they use at the moment.
We would value your input into this process so please do come along to the events or log onto the online mapping tool and record your views.
Please find details of the Bear Flat event attached, I will be sending details of the London Road event in the next few days but for reference it will be held on Thursday 26th of January from 3pm until 6pm.
I would be very grateful if you could pass the details on to any groups or individuals you think would find this of interest and please do get in touch if you require any further information.
If we truly truly want to “get people out of cars” then we need to provide an environment that is built from the ground up to prioritise the safety and convenience of people walking and cycling. This video explains Vison Zero, an approach to road design that has been adopted in the USA and most scandinavian countries.
The vision is considered naive.
There are no target modal-split values in the vision. The poster child for sustainable cities is Freiburg in Germany. A city of around 150km2 vs Bristol’s 110km2.
Looking at the modal-split in Freiburg.
- 35% of people walked,
- 15% cycled,
- 11% used public transport (trains, buses, trams),
- 9% were car sharing
- 29% in single occupancy vehicles.
By 1999, 17 years later:
- 23% walked (-13%),
- 27% cycled (+12%),
- 18% were using public transport (+7%),
- 6% car shared (-3%),
- 26% single occupancy vehicles (-3%)
The ambition by 2020 is:
- 24% walking (+1%),
- 27% cycling (0%),
- 20% public transport (2%),
- 5% car sharing (-1%)
- 24% single occupancy vehicles (-2%)
Freiburg is a big city which has had phenomenal success and has achieved this through the building of 400km of segregated cycle tracks but think getting more than 27% of the population cycling is not possible.
So when you look at the West of England transport vision fails to answer two simple questions.
- What is the current modal-split by city/region?
- What is the target modal-split by city/region?
Once you have the answer to these two questions, you can actually begin to have a vision. At the moment the vision just feels like civil servants and politicians wanting to play with very big expensive train sets. It is vague and appears to have been deliberately written this way to allow for future back tracking.
Walking and cycling has been lumped into one budget. This type of lumping in creates situations where councils misuse money intended to develop good segregated cycling connections between communities and schools/centres of employment and allocate it to ‘public realm improvement schemes’. Bath’s Seven Dials scheme being a classic example of wasting cycling ambition fund money.
Cycling needs its own budget and one that has specific controls/standards/audits around the bid processes to ensure the delivery of high quality segregated infrastructure.
The World Health Organisation has recommended that 20% of any transport budget is allocated to the development of cycle networks as these support the 0-8km travel range which covers the majority of most people commuting to school/work. Given the £7.5 Billion budget, the vision should be allocating £1.5 Billion to cycling ALONE not £0.4 Billion to cycling AND walking.
An example to consider is London which has just allocated £900 Million to cycling. The cycle superhighway has enabled Embankment to increase road capacity by 5% by reducing the space allocated to motorised vehicles.
The vision also ignores the need for legislature to achieve better road capacity. Transport For London have been able to increase road ‘people’ capacity, note the lack of using the term traffic flow, as they ‘own’ the major corridors and can do what they want with them.
The trunk roads within our cities are at the whim of the councils. In many instances on-road parking is a higher priority for local politicians than the development of a balanced modal-split transport network. In other words, you can have segregated cycle tracks but only if it does not impact the residents on-street parking on major A roads. This approach must be changed.
The vision also needs to clearly state that transport is a public health crisis that, through deliberate design over many decades, has encouraged the use of the car as “the” premier form of transport while degrading public transport. This article discusses this in detail. Highways and planning must take responsibility for delivering healthy environments. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/15/sedentary-lifestyles-social-care-crisis-exercise-ill-health-old-age
Sedentary lifestyles and morbidity can be countered through delivery of good active travel options and discouraging the use of the private car.
The vision document fails to deal with any connection to Radstock. It very much discards rural North East Somerset. This seems short-sighted.
Particularly within Bath the maps are way-off with the key cycle network routes. See the attached Bath Cycle Network Map. The light rapid transit system appears to be using the Bristol To Bath cycle path while running parallel to the current rail network. Why not increase the number of trains? The authors have forgotten the 2007 protests in Bristol when the BRT was proposed to run along the cycle path. The authors of the vision also seem to have forgotten that the path has been widened in parts due to the immense number of people using it.
It is estimated that 20-25% of rush hour traffic is the school run. The school run must be tackled and eradicated. Many councils are beginning to create school drop-off exclusion zones, but more importantly, ways need to be found to offer free public transport to all school children. Some schools in Oxford have 80% of pupils cycling to school, not through training and education, but because the provided infrastructure enables traffic free commuting from their communities to the school. Travel independence is key for school children.
The JTS mentions education, by which we are assuming Bikeability training. However cycling rates in 10+ children are phenomenally low. No matter how well you train kids, they will not share the road with HGVs and will be driven to school.
We stress again the modal-split that Freiburg will achieve in 2020:
- 24% walking
- 27% cycling,
- 20% public transport,
- 5% car sharing
- 24% single occupancy vehicles.
The majority of travel within the city of Freiburg is by bicycle, the same can be said for Copenhagen, and even some parts of London.
It is considered vital that the JTS provides target modal-splits by region/city and then actively pursues those targets through the correct allocation of budgets to either encourage or discourage forms of transport. These can be derived from the 2011 census data and re-evaluated using the 2021 census data.
More importantly, the JTS MUST split cycling out from walking. It is not acceptable to have these two different forms of transport that do not mix well together in one pot of money.
Apologies for the late notification. Meeting at the Guild next to the Guildhall http://www.theguildhub.co.uk/en
– Cycle Map primary, secondary, and tertiary route classification in preparation for Local Cycling Walking Infrastructure Plans that the council will need to consider publishing in the new year. https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1TNfz2RC7Y5l_pJAuGun8o2fa-CmNbKvcJl9Gb9tyqfo/edit
– https://www.jointplanningwofe.org.uk/consult.ti develop official response.
– Campaigns for the new year.
– Potentially, if there is time, discuss the ‘Living Heart’ Proposal https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1Fq0y0lAWJlLXvHvd_5wqTu8a8BEcJ05rN9I5G7v9wDA/edit
- Sustrans follow-up work on their 3 year old report – Adam and Julian were supposed to be invited to join the steering group
- BathBridge – www.bathbridge.co.uk/…/bath-alliance-for-transport-and-pub…/ – the way ahead?
- CAG funding – all to be spent on the new Bath Quays bridge-to-nowhere? CycleBath position?
Note that the guild hub offers soft drinks (50p per can) or free coffee. If you want to drink alcohol, please bring your own 😉
See you there.
Been a long time and I think this is very much over due.
1) News on the BaNES Cycling Walking and Accessibility Forum (none as of today and am chasing with Paul Crossley).
2) Cross-Groups Bath Die-In Protest. That last email from Cllr Clarke made me angry (https://www.facebook.com/groups/CycleBath/permalink/1155344674511775/). This will need Police co-ordination. (Adam Reynolds& Dick Daniel to coordinate with other groups)
3) Bath Bike Jumble (Tim Beadle now heading this up).
4) Council to implement an Inclusive Cycling Campaign? (All routes should cope with a 2.8m long by 1.2m wide cycle design vehicle) (Need somebody to lead on this.)
5) Construction update covering Bellotts Road Bridge and Destructor Bridge. (Any others?)
6) Tube maps and a vision for Bath.
7) Cycle Racks on Buses update. (DfT now have their cycling officer involved.)
8) Let’s talk about Cllr Clarke’s exceptionally ignorant email (https://www.facebook.com/groups/CycleBath/permalink/1155344674511775/)
9) Street Diets as part of road resurfacing programmes.
10) Keynsham is getting active.
Anything else people want to raise, please add to comments.
The local farmer closes the path for his annual pheasant shoots on the dates listed. (Nov. 5th is a Saturday). Note the alternative route for walkers can get very muddy.
Utrecht is a city Bath can learn so much from.
People were drinking champagne on the street and enjoying beautiful singing; not something you see every day. They were celebrating the opening of yet another reconstructed street in Utrecht; their street, with their homes on it. Again, the city of Utrecht has reclaimed a lot of space from motor traffic, to become living space for people.
The new Maliesingel has become a very pleasant residential street alongside the old Utrecht city moat. The walking path on the left hand side could only be rebuilt because the roadway is so much narrower now.
The current council is delivering on what the former council decided: the car is no longer king in Utrecht. The closer to the city centre, the more people friendly the city has to be. Driving your motor vehicle into the city centre will remain possible when it is absolutely necessary, but it will not be a convenient option…
View original post 1,234 more words
It’s good to see that Ben seems to be focusing on walking and cycling. However I’m guessing Ben didn’t get the more recent memo from the council where they admitted that the East Park And Ride would have no effect on congestion and that it was all about ‘future’ required capacity. This is all going on while in Wiltshire plans are moving ahead to open up Corsham Train Station with a high capacity car park sometime 2019 onwards. What’s significant about this is that they are predicting 400,000 journeys a year with a focus on people wanting to get to Swindon. Corsham could become a Bath Park and Rail site and double that number of journeys from that train station. I hope BaNES are supporting the case for opening the Corsham Train Station and in particular working with Wiltshire to create a good park and rail option for Bath.
Bath’s city roads are now operating at maximum capacity – says the city’s MP Ben Howlett – and that means any accident or obstruction within the system is causing chaos.
He’s jumped into the traffic issue fray by urging B&NES to pull its finger out and take measures to ease things.
London Road traffic.
Mr Howlett says Bath city centre has seen even worse congestion than normal in recent days.
In a statement he says, “It is increasingly clear that the city’s roads are at maximum capacity and that any accident, or obstruction causes widespread traffic issues. I am therefore calling on the Council to place renewed energy behind the Integrated Transport Strategy, which has received cross party support, to improve cycle paths, create safer non-car routes to schools and facilitate a stronger focus on walking in the city.
I also urge the Council to take the long overdue…
View original post 206 more words
On Monday the Department for Transport’s Think! campaign launched an HGV ‘safety’ campaign that has been universally panned by cycling organisations and campaigners. There’s a very good summary of the reasons why here.
The intention of the video is apparently to show the risks of ‘undertaking’ HGVs when they are about turn. But the video itself is, frankly, a mess. It initially shows an implausible situation – a lorry travelling on the wrong side of the road on a 20mph street, with a cyclist somehow managing to travel even faster on their inside.
Why is the lorry right over on the wrong side of the road, so far from the junction? I can’t think of any reasonable explanation. Most likely the driver has started to overtake the person cycling, who has then implausibly managed to accelerate and move ahead of the HGV.
This is followed by a shot, accompanied by tasteless clips of meat…
View original post 1,281 more words